J wrote:ill be honest, i dont really understand why anyone has nominted wiseman as a bad poster, it really doesnt makes sense to me.
Anybody want to actually give some examples of bad post of his, or is it just trying to get back at him for some odd reason??
I appreciate that J. Cheers mate.
I think its because of this-
I say what I think and I tell it to peoples face. I am honest, yet reasonable, and stick up for myself on this site, and this sometimes leads to controversy. For some stupid reason, as soon as you show any sign of arguing, or the faintest undercurrent of controversy, people do not like 'the dark side' and will place you in their bad books.
I say this on behalf of myself and others such as jcdenton.
The reason why people have nominated us is either because they have followed suite, or because of a massive misunderstanding.
"Worst poster" means stupid, mono-syllabic and meaningless posts, that rarely bare any use to any people. People who do this most frequently are the worst posters.
Now if you actually read any of my posts, you'll find that I am completely against this, and always do my best to help.
Sputnik is guilty of this. He told me "some of your posts are a bit controversial". So bloody what?? That doesn't make me a bad poster! That means I am more interesting and more noticable!
Just beause someone speaks their mind, and is controversial in your eyes, DO NOT NOMINATE THEM FOR THIS CATEGORY.
He who thinks too much about every step he takes will stay on one leg all his life.