Midfielder VS Striker

Discuss and compare your favorite players
Post Reply

What would you want to be, a great Midfielder or a great Striker?

Poll ended at 07 Aug 2006, 17:31

Midfielder
7
44%
Striker
9
56%
 
Total votes: 16
DouDou
Senior Member
Posts: 181
Joined: 18 May 2006, 02:27
Location: New Jersey, United Sates

Midfielder VS Striker

Post by DouDou » 31 Jul 2006, 17:31

If you were to choose between beeing a great Midfielder and being a great Striker. what would your choice be?
I would chose to be a great Midfielder, because Midfielders are more polyvalent, they can score, dribble, defend, pass, take free kicks. Besides most of football legends were midfielders: Pele, Maradonna, Rivaldo, Ronaldinho....
Top
peps1154
Veteran Member
Posts: 1513
Joined: 09 Jul 2005, 12:59
Location: Schiller Park/Chicago

Post by peps1154 » 31 Jul 2006, 17:41

I would be happy just to be a pro. however if I had such a luxurious choice I would pick to be a midfielder because simply I play in the midfield and I feel the best there.
Top
MBanić
Junior Member
Posts: 96
Joined: 10 Jul 2006, 15:52

Post by MBanić » 31 Jul 2006, 20:36

I would want to be a striker, as my idol is one too. I just love the feeling you have when you score a great goal.
Top
gnarlyjim
EF Mountie
Posts: 3767
Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 02:08
Location: Canada

Post by gnarlyjim » 01 Aug 2006, 14:19

I like Midfield more as a player, but the reality is, Striker's get more publicity and $$$!

I guess if the money was similar I would want to be a midfielder.
Top
floater
Senior Member
Posts: 158
Joined: 16 Jul 2006, 21:37
Location: Ohio, USA

Post by floater » 01 Aug 2006, 14:23

i would be a midefielder because the midefielders are the leaders of the game
the structure of the midefield and how they play decides how the whole team plays
"In football, the greatest satisfaction is winning when they say you can't." - Robert Paul

Image
Top
DouDou
Senior Member
Posts: 181
Joined: 18 May 2006, 02:27
Location: New Jersey, United Sates

Post by DouDou » 01 Aug 2006, 14:59

gnarlyjim wrote:but the reality is, Striker's get more publicity and $$$!

I guess if the money was similar I would want to be a midfielder.
Not so true mate, Midfielders do get equal publicity/money as strikers, As I mentioned before most of football legends were are Midfielders
Cruyef, Platini, Zidane...
Top
Ronnie9
Junior Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 31 Oct 2005, 12:33
Location: Sweet home Philly, US

Post by Ronnie9 » 01 Aug 2006, 15:39

[quote="floater"]i would be a midefielder because the midefielders are the leaders of the game
the structure of the midefield and how they play decides how the whole team plays[/quote]

Me too for the same reason, and I really think the character has alot to do with your role in the field.
Top
*yung-ital*
Pending Mod
Posts: 1317
Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 03:52
Location: Canada

Post by *yung-ital* » 01 Aug 2006, 22:59

Midfield is such an important position, midfielders control the whole game, they do almost every responsibility and are looked up to. I would choose midfield.
Image
KevinR9 Thanks Bruvva
Top
thrillboy
Veteran Member
Posts: 340
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 00:37
Location: Washington State

Post by thrillboy » 01 Aug 2006, 23:16

Personally I would choose striker, becasue I am really fast and quick, but I don't have good endurance which you need to be a midlfielder.
Top
ronalldinyo
New User
Posts: 22
Joined: 27 Jul 2006, 15:07
Location: united states

Post by ronalldinyo » 02 Aug 2006, 11:55

scoring goals is great, but if you cant control the mid then you lose.
Top
Fehmi
Sophomore Member
Posts: 49
Joined: 07 Mar 2006, 17:23
Location: middle east

Post by Fehmi » 04 Aug 2006, 17:56

its really hard to choose but i would want to be a striker coz if im a great midfielder aand i dont have good strikers i will have trouble giving them through passes and all and it will be hard dfor me to score goals for a win being in mid court. if im a great striker i can find a way to score without the help of teammates if they arent good enough.
Top
G-Unit-Freestyler
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 01 Jan 2006, 16:11

Post by G-Unit-Freestyler » 04 Aug 2006, 18:00

Striker... coz of the feeling u get when u score
Top
MrSark
Junior Member
Posts: 60
Joined: 14 May 2006, 04:16
Location: The United States

Re: Midfielder VS Striker

Post by MrSark » 05 Aug 2006, 03:30

DouDou wrote:If you were to choose between beeing a great Midfielder and being a great Striker. what would your choice be?
I would chose to be a great Midfielder, because Midfielders are more polyvalent, they can score, dribble, defend, pass, take free kicks. Besides most of football legends were midfielders: Pele, Maradonna, Rivaldo, Ronaldinho....
Pele, Rivaldo, and Ronaldinho are not midfielders. Pele played CF for the Selecao, NY Cosmos, etc. Rivaldo played CF for Barca, Depor, and currently for Olympiakos. Most football legends were strikers, but in todays game they call them CAM which is basically a CF. If you look at all those players you named, none of them can defend worth a damn, and there game is all based off of attacking, attacking and more attacking. In the World Cup for example, Ronaldo and Rivaldo were playing CF and ST with Ronaldinho on the wing.

...by the way it's Maradona with one 'n'.
Top
DouDou
Senior Member
Posts: 181
Joined: 18 May 2006, 02:27
Location: New Jersey, United Sates

Re: Midfielder VS Striker

Post by DouDou » 06 Aug 2006, 00:14

MrSark wrote:
...by the way it's Maradona with one 'n'.
Thanks for the spelling pointer, nigaud.
Top
ronaldoR7
Senior Member
Posts: 198
Joined: 04 Jun 2008, 10:37

RE: midfielder VS Striker

Post by ronaldoR7 » 06 Jun 2008, 11:21

[quote]G-Unit-Freestyler
Striker... coz of the feeling u get when u score

I'd say striker my idol Ronaldo -Ac milan is a striker
n i agree its one of the best feelings to score a goal
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Players”