Mira

Open discussion about the EFFC II contest
Post Reply
Sputnik
Moderator
Posts: 1913
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 21:47
Location: London, ENG

Mira

Post by Sputnik » 25 Mar 2006, 21:15

  (¯`v´¯)
   `·.¸.·´
  ¸.·´¸.·´¨)    ¸.·*¨)
(¸.·´      (¸.·´      (¸.·´´·¸¸.·¨¯`
Image

Sputnik
Moderator
Posts: 1913
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 21:47
Location: London, ENG

Post by Sputnik » 28 Mar 2006, 00:37

I will review each video in a judging like format

C1. What was the skill level of the freestyler?
C2. What was the most complicated trick that he/she performed?
S1. What was the style of the freestyler?
S2. How did his/her tricks flow from one to the next?
O1. How original were the tricks in the video?
O2. Was was the most interesting or unique part of this video?
E1. Did the video feel too long or too short? How well was it edited?
E2. How fun was it to watch this video?

Complexity score: 1-10 pts
Style score: 1-10 pts
Originality score: 1-10 pts
Entertainment score: 1-10 pts


C1. Skill level in air tricks was basic but sitdowns and upper could be classed a little higher
C2. Skipping headstall
S1. The style was a bit of everything, good control especially juggling and headstall
S2. There was almost no flow except in the short upper combos. a lot of juggling.
O1. The skipping headstall was origionl, but the rest of the video was quite standard
O2. Skipping headstall, sitdowns, or headstall standing-sitting-standing
E1. Video felt a bit too long, quirkey song i liked, but too much juggling in between tricks which were a bit repetative.
E2. Her t-shirt was FUN :) quite a plain video, skill not fun centred.

Complexity: 3
Style: 3
Origionality: 5
Entertainment: 4
  (¯`v´¯)
   `·.¸.·´
  ¸.·´¸.·´¨)    ¸.·*¨)
(¸.·´      (¸.·´      (¸.·´´·¸¸.·¨¯`
Image

Post Reply