This is the first and possibly last post i'm making on this topic.
Since canadianfootballer's opinion aggravates me greatly. (skip to the last five lines if you don't wanna read all of it.)
canadianfootballer wrote:you know why i think they suck? BECAUSE the women in brazil argentina etc. don't have as many rights and freedoms as women in the u.s theres more discrimination against them and sh*t thus less girls there playing football...
There is some truth to this, I'm sure there is plenty of discrimination towards women in other countries who try to play sports, however North, central and South America are not a good example when you compare it to women trying to play in the middle east. (yet they still manage to get teams together AND create female referees)
I have Friends from Mexico, El Salvador, Colombia, and Brazil that tell me their girls can play just as much as guys do and that in some cases their girls (my friend from Mexico emphasized this) are better than guys here in America. So who says they're playing less football?
Furthermore, the way you support the idea that our women's national team sucks also implies that any country that doesn't have alot of discrimination against their women should automatically have good football teams. I also like the way you left canada out of your initial idiotic deduction.
canadianfootballer wrote:...yet u will see many games of mens teams where lots of women are watching the u.s womens team and canadas are only good cuz they have more rights and a better program but when brazil argentina etc. womens get more rights and a better program to develop them...
First and foremost reread the above quote aloud and tell me if it makes sense to you?
Secondly, aren't you forgetting European teams? they have better football programs to train women and a larger football following in general. Plus you can't argue about them not having rights. So by your logic teams like England, Spain, and France should own everyone else all the time.
Who told you the U.S. had a better training program than those in Brazil, Argentina, etc? We are just now setting up a league system for our girls. I mean, your deduction might be true but I want you to prove it
canadianfootballer wrote:... u will see the u.s womens team losing more often and sucking sh*t like the mens team. The u.s womens team is not that good there is just a lack of competition but its coming (example: marta owning the u.s ).
Here you're just trying to start an argument....
Lack of competition? O rly? You yourself just said other teams are beating us that shouldn't be. If there were no competition for us we'd win everything all the time.
I like they way you once again exclude Canada from this part of your argument.
canadianfootballer wrote:edit: im not saying womens football sucks im just saying that the us womens team sucks brazil all the way! brazil owned u guys 4-0
First lemme start off by saying that i've scanned a few of the posts on the five pages and feel I need to remind you guys this isn't a USA vs Canada Issue. This is a USA vs Canadianfootballer issue.
Canadian Footballer Tell me something? Have you deducted that the U.S. Women's Team "sucks sh*t" by watching them and comparing them to other teams or by pulling random deductions out of your butt?
It's not an issue of Women's rights in North, Central or South America. It's strictly and issue of support for the team and the proper training. And like I said above, the situation becomes different when you compare western teams to those in the middle east (THAT'S when discrimination becomes and issue). On that front you can see why Brazil is so capable.
You say we suck more than brazil? O rly?
In a country such as brazil where they live and breath football why would they keep their girls from playing it? If anything why aren't you explaining why Brazil outranks you?
USA ranks 1.
Brazil ranks 4. (8 being their lowest ever)
Canada Ranks 9. (9 being your highest ever)
What's your excuse?
http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/ranki ... nking.html