Religious God is very simple to dis-prove, in a religious sense God is all powerful and all merciful... The world and is many natural systems are very efficeint but have many flaws that contribute to suffering, these flaws contribute to the notion that God is either not all powerful or not all merciful and hence not omnipotent and hence non existantYou sound awfully certain about a subject which has no way to be proven
A religious God can not exist in a world like this
A higher force does not claim any athourity over humans mercy or power, hence it can be interpreted as responsible for the many systems of natural growth, decline and learning we experience in our lifetimes, but the systematic flaws can not be attributed to a fault in the higher power
A higher power can, and probably does exist in todays world, more-so Religions are mere bad interpretations of this higher power
You either didn't read or didn't process what I said did you? There is a higher power, that entity is not bound by religious idealsReligion is man's interpretation of God and what he is saying. God is not flawed, Religion is.
If your argument is that there is no God, then think about what happens after death. Our lifetime is a mere nano second in physical time, you really think that we experience life the way we do for no reason? I believe it is a gift from God.
Well I strongly beleive in natural law and system...Why does something you consider beautiful have to be attributed to something rather than it just happened'? Even then, some people think certain things are beautiful while others don't, did a higher power not influence that?
And I've always felt risque, desirable things (lust) are things created by nature to educate you in hollow, meaningless connections with desirable substances, emotions or relationship
I've also always felt beautiful, heart warming things (love) are things nature rewards you with once you understand the lack of potentcy in indelicate desires
So I beleive 'real' beauty is an attribute created by the or a higher power as a 'nirvana' in a sense
to cover it in breif...
Ive always felt that argument as questionable for proof as a higher power. Your body's systems communicate with the sole purpose of survival.To explain myself better. You have many million cells in your body, all of them interlinked by chemical and nervous transmission. They communicate because they need to, to survive. However, we only have one mind. Do mere bacteria crawling on your skin have a mind? A memory? A consciousness?
Emotions etc. are just advanced versions of primitive survival techniques (fear = protection, love = reproduction)
Bacteria's body systems have only the purpose of survival, it is so successful that it survives without much evolution
Our body systems are just a result of many evolutionary steps in attempt to make the ultimate survival machine
Evoluotion and science explains that happening better than a Higher Power