hummel clleats

Reviews and discussion about soccer gear
Post Reply
PSVBeasley11
New User
Posts: 7
Joined: 25 Jul 2006, 16:18

hummel clleats

Post by PSVBeasley11 »



I was just wonderin does anybody use hummel cleats?

It seems like most people use nike or adidas. i have the hummel 6.2 concepts and they are great.

Hummels have worked great for me what do u guys think about hummels?
:D
Impossible is nothing
af2266
Moderator
Posts: 280
Joined: 13 Mar 2005, 23:02
Location: plant city, florida

Post by af2266 »

They seem to fancy, I just stick to the vapors. They look good though.
some guy yelled at me...
thierryhenry14
Senior Member
Posts: 155
Joined: 07 May 2006, 23:41

Post by thierryhenry14 »

af2266 wrote:They seem to fancy, I just stick to the vapors. They look good though.
yea i think vapors are a good choice as well i don't own a pair but i hope to in the future. They are lightweight and have a onepiece design so you can strike the ball with more accuracy. Definatley one of the best boots on the line. Hummel is the soccer luxury brand. My friend had a pair of hummel boots and they didn't last him very long.
Image (Thanks Kevin R9)

Sometimes in football you just have to score goals -Thierry Henry-
PSVBeasley11
New User
Posts: 7
Joined: 25 Jul 2006, 16:18

Post by PSVBeasley11 »

mine were very comfortable but they didnt last me that long i already have to get new ones
Impossible is nothing
karlofootball10
Veteran Member
Posts: 789
Joined: 10 May 2005, 02:30
Location: VA, USA

Post by karlofootball10 »

Hummel boots are ugly and not to mention the reputation they have as the cheap, low quality equipment. I would never buy Hummel boots, especially the new ones that cost over $100, I would much rather buy boots i know are good, like Nike or Adidas or Puma.
if a quiz is quizzical, then what's a test?
Image
arminho09
Junior Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 12 Jul 2006, 06:06
Location: United States

Post by arminho09 »

karlofootball10 wrote:Hummel boots are ugly and not to mention the reputation they have as the cheap, low quality equipment. I would never buy Hummel boots, especially the new ones that cost over $100, I would much rather buy boots i know are good, like Nike or Adidas or Puma.
i bought some hummels because i always heard good things about them and i wasent disapointed...the kangaroo leather is the softest and most comfortable out of any nike, adidas , or puma boot and the look is good if you get the Tomassons but the other ones look classic if you like those type of boots..and also you know why they are all so expensive is because the quality is better then any major boot company..also the kangaroo leather last longer then any nike or adidas kangaroo boot and is also more comfortable.
af2266
Moderator
Posts: 280
Joined: 13 Mar 2005, 23:02
Location: plant city, florida

Post by af2266 »

No need to call anyone an idiot..
some guy yelled at me...
arminho09
Junior Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 12 Jul 2006, 06:06
Location: United States

Post by arminho09 »

sorry but he is talking complete nonsense
karlofootball10
Veteran Member
Posts: 789
Joined: 10 May 2005, 02:30
Location: VA, USA

Post by karlofootball10 »

ok, they are still ugly and i would never buy them. oh, and why dont you put a hummel picture as you signature since you like it so much :roll:
Image

$120, never in my life would i give $120 for those, i dont care how comfortable the leather is.
if a quiz is quizzical, then what's a test?
Image
af2266
Moderator
Posts: 280
Joined: 13 Mar 2005, 23:02
Location: plant city, florida

Post by af2266 »

It's all a matter of personal preference. Some like it some don't.
some guy yelled at me...
arminho09
Junior Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 12 Jul 2006, 06:06
Location: United States

Post by arminho09 »

yea those are ugly i would never get those but they do have boots that look good
Image and these look good
Image
and i dont have a sig of hummels because i dont know how to make one and that sig is a promotion for www.bootnr.com and also both of these are under 80$ on sale
Post Reply