Search found 69 matches
Hummel boots are ugly and not to mention the reputation they have as the cheap, low quality equipment. I would never buy Hummel boots, especially the new ones that cost over $100, I would much rather buy boots i know are good, like Nike or Adidas or Puma. i bought some hummels because i always hear...
the IIIs are better because they are more comfortable and the carbon heel wraps your heel and then when you shoot the ball or somethin your foot wont move around in the boot and i think they look nicer
hey my highschool seasons coming and and my boots are falling apart literally and im trying to decide between the vapor IIIs predator absolutes the puma v1.06 nike air legends or f50 maybe those new lotto zehro gravity or w.e there called i want a shoe thats light socklike fit and i have a narrowis...
- 20 Jul 2006, 06:56
- Forum: Equipment
- Topic: Adidas +F 50 Tunit or Nike Mercurial Vapor?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3465
are you talking about Vapor IIIs if you are i would go with the vapors because the Tunit screw in studs are a pain in the ass and they also brake easy...and the toe area is huge..the vapors are lighter and also can last longer then the tunits
not a good idea..the leather would stiffen and wouldent be soft and as comfortable and it doesnt realy make a big difference if you air dry them or not..you should just clean and get leather food for the leather
the only thing they are good for is comfort...after like 2 months the leather fades away expecialy at the toe area..they are pretty heavy expecialy in rain..i dont like them at all i threw them away after 3 months