Expert Football > Training > Soccer Strategy > Winning Mentality > Is Soccer Boring to Watch?
by Tribune News 1993Soccer resembles basketball with no hands. It uses zone and man defenses,
movement away from the ball and a team-oriented attack. The transition
game is critical to success.
And yet it is completely unlike basketball (and other American sports)
in that there are no time stoppages except a five-minute halftime. No
quarters, no timeouts, no stopping the clock on certain out-of-bounds
plays.
A soccer half is 45 minutes of running time and constant action. Minutes
are added for time lost because of injuries, but only at the discretion of
the referee.
"In American games, everything is broken down - into innings, quarters,
plays," said Timo Liekoski, assistant coach of the U.S. national team.
"There are sudden highs and lows. The concentration for those games is
different than for 45 minutes non-stop.
Obviously, scoring is important, but in soccer the focus is on the
buildup."
Buildup, in American vernacular, is boring.
"Boring is whatever you don't understand," counters Sigi Schmid, UCLA
coach and a U.S. team assistant. "If I take some people from Germany to a
baseball game, and they see a bunch of people standing around, they'll say
that's boring. They don't understand.
Soccer is all about time and space. What you're trying to do offensively
is give players time on the ball and get into dangerous spaces.
Defensively, it's just the opposite. You're trying to restrict their space
and take away their time."
That can be done, for example, by pressuring the ball or increasing the
number of defenders in an area. Offensively, teammates can lure defenders
out of an area to give another player more space and time.
Liekoski calls soccer a "turnover sport," where the best teams instantly
take advantage of the transition from offense to defense, recognizing what
they can do and then reacting. But soccer has more turnovers on a larger
playing surface than basketball's, and fewer set plays. Many more options
develop, which can be confusing to a novice viewer.
A player's duties are comprehensible, but more difficult to appreciate if
you have never been there - receiving a pass inside the 18-yard line and
instantly assessing where your teammates are, how the defense is set up,
whether you should pass or shoot and in what direction.
The tactics are simple to explain, difficult to execute. The idea, as in
many sports, is to gain a numerical advantage against your opponent and
then attack. It's a lot like military strategy in that sense.
"Defensively, you have a line of retreat, just like an army does,"
Schmid said. "If you're caught unprepared, you use delay tactics until
you get reinforcements and can get organization behind the ball. But if
you're in the third of the field near your own goal, you have to deal with
the immediate danger (a shot on goal)."
The best teams, with highly talented athletes, can capitalize on
situations in which they don't have numerical advantage, such as a
two-on-two, or even a one-on-two attack.
Schmid is trying to help television track the game for spectators with new
statistics, such as time of possession and "offensive-third
penetrations." The latter charts how often a team penetrates into the
final third of the field nearest the opponent's goal. Television, with a
John Madden teleprompter approach, could show viewers from what side a
team tends to attack, and how often it shoots once inside that part of the
field.
Another important thing to watch is the flow of the players. They move
forward and backward toward the goals, but they also move across the field
(in diagonal runs) to aid the attack or create defensive pressure. The
attacking team tries to penetrate into its offensive third of the field,
and the defensive team attempts to regain possession.
A team's sweeper (the last defensive player before the goalkeeper) is
generally about 40 yards from its center forward. As one moves up field,
the other follows, ideally maintaining the same space between them at all
times.
Schmid said some subtle changes would make soccer more appealing to U.S.
fans without changing basic elements. Already, the goalie has been limited
in when he can pick up the ball, which prevents delays. Throw-ins might be
converted to kick-ins from out of bounds. The scoring system for standings
could be changed - awarding three points for a victory instead of two,
providing more incentive for teams to win instead of tie.
But more drastic changes (such as dividing the game into quarters) are
meeting stalwart resistance in the highly traditional sport.







